Georgians Gone Wild
NA07 tonight for the Brits, and Alert Janeite Kathleen sent us scans of the Radio Times articles about the film. The main article seems to be establishing the meme that no doubt will be rammed down our throats: that NA isn’t that good anyway, so isn’t it lovely that Andrew Davies has fixed it?
Lustful brigands, rumpled beds, girls in their nighties tied to trees…it’s hardly Jane Austen as we know it, but ITV’s production of Northanger Abbey is the most enormous fun. Adapted for the screen by Andrew Davies, the script plays expertly with the Gothic fantasies underpinning Austen’s least-filmed–and possibly, least-loved–text.
There are just so many things wrong with that sentence that we are at a loss.
“All we’ve done is to make things easier for the 21st-century audience by showing on screen what’s going on in the character’s head,” says producer Keith Thompson.
Oh, gee, thanks! Because we’re really, really stupid!
“For Catherine, being plunged into Bath society is a bit like a schoolgirl these days going to Glastonbury or Ibiza–a place where all the proprieties are suspended for ‘the season,’” explains (Felicity) Jones.
Um, no. Sorry, sweetie, you’re very cute and all, but…no.
While JJ Feild stars as Catherine’s official love interest, the upright if enigmatic clergyman Henry Tilney
Henry Tilney is hardly enigmatic. He is amusing, charming, intelligent, well-educated, a good dancer, likes novels, and looks fab in a great coat. Anything else we can help you with?
…the show is somewhat stolen by William Beck as the oafish John Thorpe.
“There’s no two ways about it, my character is fairly ghastly, but I think you have to play against that. I don’t think anyone goes aobut in the world thinking, “I’m a s**t and I’m going to act like a s**t and it doesn’t ring true if you act it that way,” says Beck.
Hee. Very true!
Like last week for MP, Germaine Greer has written a column about the novel and, unlike everyone else, seems to actually have read the bally thing.
Catherine is fascinated by Henry Tilney’s ironic manner and in love with him from pretty much the first time she sees him, which is lucky because he’s just the sort of man she ought to be impressed by and in love with. In remaining unimpressed by John Thorpe, the brother of her new friend Isabella, she shows the correctness of her untutored judgment. In her instinctive response to the unprincipled behaviour of Isabella, Austen shows us the warmth of Catherine’s attachments and the soundness of her judgment.
We are the more shocked, then, when she begins to behave in an irrational manner. The reason is simple: she has been reading Gothic novels, in particular The Mysteries of Udolpho by Ann Radcliffe. Nobody reads these now, but there are plenty of books in print that can affect our capacity for clear thinking and rational judgment just as disastrously.
[. . .]
What Austen shows in Northanger Abbey is just how easy it is to separate a young woman from her own good sense. Today’s popular culture pressures women to behave irrationally, to starve themselves, say, or get drunk and wasted, or spend money they haven’t got. Catherine’s popular culture tricks her into entertaining absurd suspicions about Henry’s father, General Tilney, and these delusions in turn mask from her General Tilney’s real defects of character.
Hear, hear!
Interestingly, the “review” of NA07 in the same publication is not quite gushing.
Jones makes a chirpy, if vaguely annoying heroine, but the whole thing lacks charm.
Yikes!
Ray Bennett gives the film a good review in The Hollywood Reporter.
Capturing vividly the flush and wonder of adolescence, the film mines Austen’s first-written but last-published novel
Um, no.
…to find purest nuggets of wit, romance and social satire. The story’s 18th-century heroine, Catherine Morland, has a fevered imagination and Davies draws on Austen’s droll illustrations of it to create scenes of gothic adventure.
This is Austen for those who imagine wrongly that her novels are dry and dainty. There’s lust and hunger in these characters and Davies, along with director Jon Jones (”A Very Social Secretary,” “Archangel”), gives them full rein while never betraying the social straightjackets of the time.
The progress of Catherine’s unhappiness from the events of the evening was as follows. It appeared first in a general dissatisfaction with every body about her, while she remained in the rooms, which speedily brought on considerable weariness and a violent desire to go home. This, on arriving in Pulteney-street, took the direction of extraordinary hunger, and when that was appeased, changed into an earnest longing to be in bed; such was the extreme point of her distress; for when there she immediately fell into a sound sleep which lasted nine hours, and from which she awoke perfectly revived, in excellent spirits, with fresh hopes and fresh schemes. - Northanger Abbey, Vol. I, Chap. IX
Lust and hunger, indeed.
Alert Janeite Rob Hardy reports that the Guardian also has a review of the film by Sarah Hughes, which he couldn’t find online.
The title of the review is “My Heart Belongs to Tilney.” The review calls Felicity Jones “perfect” as Catherine. After brief mention of Andrew Davies’ daydream scenes, the review concludes: “Ultimately, though, Northanger Abbey is a novel that celebrates reading and the pleasures of getting lost in a book as much as it does the first flush of love. This clever, spirited adaptation gets that absolutely right. Miss it if you dare.”
Incidentally, Alert Janeite Emma sent us a link to her local news program(me) on ITV, which had a feature about JJ Feild and Blake Ritson paying a visit to Chawton Cottage. Unfortunately, it’s only available to viewers in the UK. Click on the link, then Thames Valley–Evening Bulletins, then Thames Valley Tonight for Friday, March 23. Emma said, “To get on to part 2 of the programme you have to watch the first part of the programme, then watch some adverts (patiently!) then the 2nd part will come on and it is the first feature.”













March 25th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
Sounds promising! Although, Henry Tilney something of a ’snob’??
Mags, why ‘Um, no’ to the reference of NA being last published? It may not have been the (single book) last published, but as I recall both NA and Persuasion first hit the market together in a single bound volume. One of my most precious possessions is just such a joint edition from the 1901 re-printing.
March 25th, 2007 at 4:21 pm
It was the “first written” part. That would be S&S.
March 25th, 2007 at 4:23 pm
P.S. And I’m extremely heartened by the mention that the film begins with a voiceover taken from Austen’s text describing Catherine’s progress from plain awkward child to heroine material. The start of the story is crucial to establishing the archness at its essence, and if they’ve decided to use Jane’s words themselves, at least we know they got off on the right foot. Now, just see how they roll out the rest of it *crosses all fingers and toes*
March 25th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
I know she already had a first, rough version of Sense & Sensibility, but wasn’t it at that time a novel in ‘letter form’ (as Lady Susan is)? From what I’ve read, it was a significantly different novel to the one we know now, until she revised it after moving to Chawton. Northanger Abbey was, in any case, the first that she (apparently) thought was finished and ready enough to be submitted for publication.
March 25th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
I give up - and have switched off. Admittedly, NA is not my favourite JA novel, but please…endless flashes of a lurid imagination throughout. A John who looks like a caricature of an evil rake. A James who looked just like Mr Bean in his first scene. I give up…
March 25th, 2007 at 6:11 pm
All I can say is.. Thank You, Andrew Davies….
I have just watched the end of Northanger Abbey and must say that I liked what I saw. NA is my least favourite novel of JA and I only read it once (a couple of years ago), but from what I could perceive (after starting it again a few days ago) the film was pretty close to the book. The acting was excellent, there was none I didn’t like. Admittedly, there was a lot of flashes of imagination throughout the film, but as Catherine was depicted as a woman with a wild imagination, it fitted into the general feel of the film.
I was VERY disappointed last week when I saw the new Mansfield Park. Today I am satisfied that Andrew Davies has yet again done a good job.
And Henry Tilney is really quite a man… Certainly a film to enjoy watching. And I don’t think there’ll be many Janeites pulling out their hair this time around
Erika
March 25th, 2007 at 6:13 pm
Germaine Greer absolutely nails it once again (see quoted excerpt above). I am very impressed with her in this and her earlier Mansfield Park comments.
March 25th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
Well spotted, Alison. Didn’t notice the Mr Bean/Morland resemblance at first although Morland does appear completely gormless. And the ghastly fantasy scenes were terrible. At least we didn’t have Mrs Allen sewing her fingers together like the previous TV version. One must hope for small mercies.
March 25th, 2007 at 7:55 pm
It was very well done I thought. It was true to the book and where it differed there were valid reasons. The fantasy sequences had relevence as we needed to know what the books Catherine was reading were really like. The titles of the books would have had relevence to early 19th century readers but not to 21st century viewers. Eleanor’s love interest was brought in early as the book ends rather abruptly with several bits of information on the last couple of pages.
On a separate point, the original publications would have been in multiple volumes. Most novels ran to three volumes. NA is a little short so it came out as two. I am not sure how many volumes Persuasion came out in but as it is also a little thin I suspect it was also two.