AustenBlog...she's everywhere

15 August 2008

REVIEW: Possibilities by Debra White Smith

Filed under: Paraliterature, Staff Reviews — Guest Poster @ 8:19 am

Possibilities by Debra White SmithReview by Allison T.

“A yardman!” says the Lady Russell character in Debra White Smith’s Possibilities to her hapless niece. “You’re wanting to marry a yardman!” Her thin eyebrows arched. Her blue eyes couldn’t have been wider—or more disdainful. Thus begins (more or less) Debra White Smith’s Possibilities, the sixth in her Austen Series of modern Christian romances.

Poor Allie Elton. [Elton? ELTON?!?!?--Ed.] Despite her master’s degree in horticulture, she doesn’t stand a chance against such a formidable force as she (unlike her predecessor Anne Elliot) attempts to marry not just across the barriers of wealth but of class.

Frederick Wently is a competent yard-man with muscles that even Auntie says “would knock the socks off a saint,” who has “some college” and aspires to join the Air Force, but in Auntie’s words: “He’s got dirt undah his finger-nails.” And Allie is the daughter of the Richard Elton, “the Peach King of the South!” Clearly an impossible alliance!

Needless to say, the marriage is aborted; Frederick goes off to perform heroic feats abroad and Allie withers into a pale, dried-up shadow of herself, until, ten years later her father announces that he will have to rent out the family mansion in order to cover eldest daughter Evelyn’s retail-therapy debts. Long years have passed, yet Allie, who would like to teach horticulture at a community college, has put her life on hold and remains a familial door-mat. Now she must move out of the family mansion in order to make way for Frederick’s sister and her husband, who have rented the place.

But, wait! There’s more.

Youngest Elton sister Macy, determined to do the exact opposite of what her father wanted, has already declined college in order to marry “the son of a germ-ridden family.”

–Um. What? Germ-ridden?

–Ahem. Well, the [Mus]Groves own a national septic system chain that services millions of households and makes them independently wealthy; however, Richard Elton can’t imagine “a peach queen married to a septic king. Nevertheless, that’s exactly what he got, right along with two septic-peachy grandsons….”—

–Whoa, gotta stop here for a minute to think about septic-peachy children.…maybe Rosemary’s baby could take a leaf (snort!) out of their book….

–Right. Well, Richard Elton and his eldest daughter Evelyn decide to go to Atlantic Beach for their, er, retrenchment, sending Allie off to do garden work and take care of Macy’s kids. Yet Fate hovers in the wings….Playboy Brent Everson, formerly married to a cousin of Allie’s, is now after Allie and her trust fund, and hopes that her tiresome Christian prudery will not prove too much of a drag on his free-and-easy life-style. Left a widower since his rich wife died from an attack of killer bees—

–What?!! Did you say KILLER BEES? Are you KIDDING me?

–I never joke about Jane Austen sequels, your Reviewer replied austerely. Nor do I have sufficient imagination to make this stuff up on my own, which is why I write reviews for free instead of raking in the doubloons writing my own Jane Austen sequel. When I said killer bees, I meant killer bees. See page 242. It was dreadful—she just swelled up and died. To continue: Brent has run through several fortunes feeding his gambling habit and supporting his mistress, Penny, who is the Mrs. Clay character scheming to marry Mr. Elton (Brent and Penny don’t know about the Eltons’ financial reverses, needless to say.)

Hoping for one last chance with Allie, the Cinderella-like Frederick (poor boy turned American war hero, throwing himself in front of his men to shield them from a land mine in Afghanistan although it has just occurred to me to wonder how and why, since he was in the Air Force, not the Marines, and there aren’t that many land mines in the sky), visits Macon, Georgia, where Allie has gone to visit her youngest sister, Macy. He is picked up as the boyfriend “catch of the day” by the preternaturally perky Louisa Grove, who proceeds to throw herself at him, hip-huggers, cropped tees and all. (Alas! Allie is a size twelve! And the hip-huggers wouldn’t suit her at all—Smith’s heroines are almost always identifiable as generously shapely.) Frederick’s clinically depressed friend, Jim, whose fiancée died of a sudden brain aneurism—“he kissed her goodnight on Tuesday and she was dead on Wednesday” which is enough to depress even the most optimistic reader—accompanies him for a portion of his visit to the area. Allie is frequently jealous of Louisa’s obvious play for Frederick, and thinks that he is a Womanizer—but then he really, really likes Christian instrumental music, and this Good Side of him confuses her. Could she be misjudging such a faithful churchgoer? Meanwhile, Brent, having stalked Anne for a few weeks, engineers a meeting with her at church, making Frederick jealous: while he thinks of church as a good place to meet a future spouse, he considers Brent a professional Church Wolf (that’s his phrase, not mine), just out for a cheap date.

Time passes, Allie begins to relent, and, one fateful day, they all go to the airfield to take a ride in Frederick’s plane when Louisa, jealous of Frederick and Allie’s increasingly obvious attraction to each other, demands to sit with her (as she claims) future husband in the front seat. Frederick refuses, says that they are not an item, and adds she can go tap dance on the wing of the aircraft and break her neck for all he cares: she can’t force him into marrying her.

Whereupon, of course, Louisa climbs up through the roof access hatch, does a little soft-shoe on top of the plane, then falls and breaks her neck—

–(Plaintively) You’re kidding again, aren’t you?

–leaving her an apparent paraplegic. (Didn’t I already tell you that I don’t make this stuff up?) In the ICU, Louisa recovers consciousness only long enough to force Frederick to agree to marry her….

I think I’ll stop with the plot recapitulation at this exciting point (though you know how it will end, don’t you?). But that brings me to an overwhelming feature of this book and, indeed the series. How can one put it delicately?…..Um, one cannot, so one will plunge in….These stories are what a friend calls NOCD (“Not Our Class, Dear”). If one aspect of the original novels (and, perhaps even more so the movies) that many JA fans admire is the portrait of a genteel, English country house style of life, then these books will come as a shock: they are firmly planted in lower-middle-class rural America.

Here the hero swills down ice-cold Cokes, repeatedly relishing its tangy burn against the back of his throat (he compares drinking Sprite with drinking muddy water—you can see that we’re on a whole different level of consumerism here; we’re not talking Hermès and Birkin and fine wines, and, actually, since only villains drink alcohol in Smith’s world, it wouldn’t matter if we were sipping rot-gut or the finest burgundy). In this world, the Mrs. Musgrove character waddles around in a “moo-moo” (what copy editor let that one slip by?), Frederick’s sister “wreaks” of Giorgio perfume and Allie doesn’t just put on makeup, she puts on Mary Kay. “All hail Mary Kay!” cries Frederick enthusiastically (p. 128), when he catches sight of the newly Made-Over Allie (her girlfriend has dragged her to a Mary Kay party) looking like an Easter egg in raspberry red lipstick, grape-colored eye-shadow and pink blusher. (The real miracle is that Allie doesn’t whap him upside the head for the remark.)

“Exactamundo!” cries Frederick (p. 309), when Allie agrees to fly to Vegas to get married. Nothing is stopping this happy Christian pair, whose favorite song is the ‘70s hit: “I Honestly Love You,” and here your faithful Reviewer would like to say that she didn’t like that song back then and is rather bitter that it is now stuck in her head, playing over and over and over again as she types.

It is easy to pull a Mary Crawford and make fun of the conservative Christianity of this series, and I rather think that Austen, who lived and died a devout, practicing Christian, would have done so: she was not fond of the evangelicals who were beginning to come in fashion towards the end of her life. Perhaps she would be more annoyed that Possibilities shows none of the delicate nuances of Persuasion: Allie and Frederick are separated only by Big Misunderstandings and Jealousy.

Still, Debra White Smith’s stories—Possibilities is the sixth and presumably the last in her Austen series—have a certain sweet appeal, and the world that she creates is consistent in its detail, whether or not one would care to live in it. Not every ardent Janeite will like these tales, but they may well bring new Converts to the Fold, so to speak, if one of her readers decides to try out the real thing. Certainly if you are a semi-professional Jane Austen Sequel reader like me, you should read at least one in Smith’s Austen series, as it will provide a good contrast to the throbs and moans of a very different kind of Austen sequel: the bodice-ripper.

12 Responses to “REVIEW: Possibilities by Debra White Smith”

  1. Deb R. Says:

    I think I’ll pass. This is all too ridiculous, even for a Christian small town Southern gal like me.

  2. Colleen Says:

    I have to say, I won’t be reading the book, but the review was quite entertaining!

  3. Sylvia M. Says:

    I have this series and like them pretty well. The best one in my opinion is Central Park the update of Mansfield Park.

  4. Deborah Says:

    I recently read two Persuasions updates (Jane Austen in Scarsdale and The Family Fortune), and while both had their moments, I’ve decided that the basic premise of Persuasion poses special problems for updaters. It’s perfectly plausible that Anne Elliot, raised in a culture that expected young women to defer to their elders, would take Lady Russell’s dump-Wentworth advice, and equally plausible that a well-meaning older woman would give that advice to a young woman venturing out into a world lacking premarital cohabitation, contraception, life insurance, workers’ comp, Social Security and jobs for respectable middle-class women. But when you transfer the action to the 21st century, the reader immediately starts wondering why the Anne character doesn’t say to the Lady Russell character, “Chill out! What’s the big deal? We’ll live together, I’ll get a job, and if it doesn’t work out, I’ll move on. I mean, it’s not like we’re going to have 10 kids together in the next two minutes!” The fact that she doesn’t say something like this leaves the Anne character looking like either much more of a doormat or much more of a snob than JA’s Anne.

  5. Allison T. Says:

    I agree with Deborah’s remarks (No. 4) above: MP suffers from the same challenge, which is why there are fewer retellings of these 2 books than of P&P. Emma is similarly constrained in a dull, small village life that most of us can scarcely imagine today, while NA contains so many spoofs of Gothics that it is a little difficult to translate to today’s world.

  6. Baja Janeite Says:

    “First Impressions” and “Reason and Romance” are the best of Debra White Smith’s Austen series books (IMHO). They are light, modern re-tellings of P&P and S&S. I don’t think she was trying to write classics-just fun, sassy, Southern chick-lit.

  7. Another Editrix Says:

    I haven’t read Possibilities, but I have read Reason and Romance, Debra White Smith’s rewrite of Sense and Sensibility. It was pretty good - Smith’s prose sometimes seems a little awkward, but she’s not a bad storyteller. Her Jane Austen series certainly wouldn’t appeal to all Janeites, but if you enjoy contemporary Christian fiction, Reason and Romance was a nice light read. If you compare these books to the originals, of course they’re going to look terrible; but since Jane Austen is one of the best novelists of all time, it isn’t really fair to make comparisons. You need to just accept Smith’s books for what they are - light, pleasant reads.

    You might not want to spend $10 buying each book, but if you can borrow them from a friend or a library, they might be worth a try. At least, Reason and Romance is worth a try. I haven’t read any other books from the series, so I can’t really comment on what they are like. From what Baja Janeite said above, R&R is one of the best of the series.

  8. Laura Says:

    Another Editrix, the comparison is fair, and it’s one the books themselves invite. They are marketed as ‘the Austen series.’

    I recently read Amanda (’Emma’ set in Tasmania - the Australian setting is why I picked it over the others in DWS’s series.) It was almost unbelievably bad on both the Antipodean and the Austenian fronts. The Emma plot loses most of its point when the heroine is a travel agent able to whizz off to any part of the world she likes at the drop of a hat. As for the portrayal of Hobart - well I had to lol (it was that or poke my eyes out.)

    I like Deborah’s comment at #4 very much. Hadn’t thought of that but it makes a great deal of sense.

  9. Mags Says:

    Deborah at #4 (and others who have mentioned it) — it’s true, though I would say Emma can be successfully translated into a modern story: Clueless, anyone? ;-) And what made Clueless brilliant (and made some Janeites not like it) is that you have to fix those problems for a modern audience, and to do that you have to change it somehow. The Anne character can’t break up with the Wentworth character because she feels duty-bound to take good, well-meant advice from her parent figures. There has to be another good reason–but then there might be an objection of “they changed the original!” It’s definitely a challenge.

    The thing is, Anne broke up with Wentworth partially because of the family objection and partially because she felt that a wife would be a burden on him as he sought out success. Look at Captain Harville, for instance, who had to struggle to support a family and wasn’t quite as successful as Wentworth. I think that gets lost sometimes.

    Also I think that’s why modern audiences sometimes have a problem with Anne (and maybe Fanny Price, too), because they don’t really understand that 18th century sense of Duty that they feel towards their elders. They take the commandment to honor your father and mother (and all elders who are concerned with you) very seriously. It’s an idea very opposite to modern ideas. I think that’s why we haven’t seen a really successful film version of MP, either. They have to change Fanny, because they’re not going to be able to make modern audiences who are unfamiliar with these social mores understand her character without footnotes.

  10. Deborah Says:

    I think some of the novels update more easily than others (P&P seems to update seamlessly — all that sexual tension never goes out of style). The successful updates figure out what’s central to the novel and find appropriate modern equivalents. What’s central to Emma is that the main character has to be a very big fish in a very small pond; the makers of Clueless, looked around for a pond as parochial and status-driven as a 19th-century English village and found . . . high school. The central issue in Persuasion is much harder to translate into a modern equivalent because Anne’s decision is so tied to specific social conditions that no longer exist; I’m not sure there could be any modern equivalent that wouldn’t fundamentally change the emotional dynamics of the novel. You need the two lovers to be separated because of a decision that she made and can defend, but which he is also justifiably angry about. If they’re just separated because of some dreadful misunderstanding, or some nefarious interference by others, you lose most of what makes the story powerful.

    I haven’t run across any MP updates, so I don’t know what that would look like. But when it comes to direct MP adaptations, I persist in thinking that a good actress and a good script could result in a version of MP that was both faithful and effective. Hope springs eternal, anyway.

  11. Mags Says:

    Totally agree about MP, Deborah–I do think it can be done, but it would be difficult and perhaps not as accessible to the audiences towards which recent adaptations have been directed. They do tend to shoot for the lowest common denominator–witness the way Henry Tilney’s witty dialogue was almost completely dispensed with in NA07, because of fear that it wouldn’t be “understood.”

  12. Julie P. Says:

    I liked Ms. Smith’s series, but I definitely agree with Deborah @ #4. Persuasion does not translate well to the present; nor does MP. But I did manage to suspend my disbelief and enjoy the series.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License