Miss Austen is not the only one with Regrets at the moment
We are pretty sure that Miss Austen Regrets got fairly good reviews after its broadcast here in the U.S., if not absolutely enthusiastic embrace, perhaps. We liked its intelligence and wit, the presentation of Jane Austen as a businesswoman and not so much of a romantic, and Olivia Williams’ magnificent performance that captured Jane Austen’s intelligence and wit and sense of fun as well as a clear-minded view of her life. It is clearly the screenwriter’s interpretation of events, not all of which we agreed with, but overall we were pleased with it. However, the theme of the UK press coverage in anticipation of the Sunday broadcast is the same old “The tar-hearted dried-up spinsters of the Jane Austen Society won’t approve! Tsk Tsk!” We really detest the press sometimes.
ETA: We nearly forgot! Alert Janeite Kate wrote to tell us that the soundtrack for Miss Austen Regrets is available to download on iTunes, and will be available to purchase in shops on May 12.
The Daily Mail (not exactly a bastion of thoughtful journalism, we admit) leads the tsking.
An incorrigible flirt with a crush on a man half her age, a woman who scandalously reneges on the acceptance of a marriage proposal, and a reveller familiar with hangovers because of her penchant for wine.
The above depiction of Jane Austen has already sent shudders down the corsets of her fans worldwide, for this little-known side to the early 19th-century author is the subject of a new BBC costume drama, Miss Austen Regrets.
*rolls eyes*
To make matters worse, when Jane died, aged 41, her sister Cassandra burned many of her letters - probably to spare the feelings of relatives and acquaintances who were the target of Jane’s barbs.
Actually, it’s more likely because they were letters to Cassandra and nobody else’s business. Slight difference. She didn’t burn the one with the dead baby joke, did she? Nope.
“People who think of Jane Austen as a little country mouse who was reserved around men will be shocked,” reveals Gwyneth Hughes, who wrote the script after painstakingly scouring Austen’s letters for revealing new insights into the author’s life.
Does anyone think that?
But Hughes is adamant. “Yes, she liked a drink,” she smiles. “When we showed the film in America, I got e-mails from the Jane Austen Society asking on what evidence we based the fact that Jane Austen had hangovers.
“So I found the quote from a letter which said: ‘I believe I drank too much wine last night; I know not else how to account for the shaking of my hand today.’”
Well, to extrapolate that to a hangover might be pushing it a bit. But no matter. (We are wondering about that “letter from the Jane Austen Society” as well.)
Another acquaintance, Reverend-Brook Bridges (played by Hugh Bonneville), is another potential husband.
“Jane mentions Bridges about half a dozen times in her letters - always affectionately and with a slight tinge of what might have been. There is a real sense of something between them, that he was a real contender, even if he never proposed,” says Hughes.
We’re not so sure about that, but it was okay in the movie.
But the third man in Austen’s life was half her age - and it was more like she had a girly, sexual crush on him. The object of her desire was the 20-year-old Dr Charles Haden (played by up-and-coming actor Jack Huston, who starred in Factory Girl).
Haden treats Jane’s sick brother and gets on very well with Jane until he is diverted by the charms of her niece Fanny.
“There was sex and passion on offer from Jane. She describes him as ’something between a man and an angel’. We have these letters with incredibly smitten feelings about this young chap. She was like a teenager,” explains Hughes.
We still are of the opinion that Jane was more likely joking with Cassandra about Fanny’s crush on Mr. Haden–imitating her way of talking, perhaps. While we think that Jane was quite capable of being pleased by an attractive young man who said lovely things about her “darling children,” we also think she would have tempered any attraction with common sense. Though he does come on kind of strong in the film!
Moving on to another article in the Yorkshire Post, which had this interesting tidbit that we think must have been a misapprehension by the reporter.
“Then I remembered that I had read Claire Tomalin’s biography of Jane Austen a few years previously,
and had come across this amazing thing.“The woman we all think of as the archetypal spinster wasn’t someone who had had no offers of marriage. She’d had an offer from an extremely eligible man who was wealthy and whom she had known all her life. He was a family friend, his sisters were her best friends, and his name was Harris Bigg.
“Had she married him she would have been rich, but she said yes one evening in December 1802, then got up the next morning and said no. Giving back-word was a shameful and appalling thing, so what happened during the intervening night, when she went off to bed, sharing a room with her sister, Cassandra?”
Tomalin had discovered this relatively little-known Austen fact through an account left by Jane’s 10-year-old niece, who witnessed the effects of this scandal on the family.
What? While we think well enough of Claire Tomalin’s biography of Jane Austen (though we usually recommend others), she was hardly the first to “discover” l’affaire Bigg-Withers. It was mentioned in Jane Austen, Her Life and Letters: A Family Record, which was published in 1913. We’re not sure if that is the first mention, but it certainly predates Tomalin. It also is mentioned in the wonderful biography by Elizabeth Jenkins, in our opinion the most readable of all Jane Austen biographies.
But at least Gwyneth Hughes admits she made most of it up–though she backs it up with evidence from the letters. As we already said, we don’t always agree with her interpretation, but Olivia Williams’ intelligently wonderful performance puts the film over the top for us. And we love this part:
“All the men in the story are real and all are mentioned in the letters – some very fully and others not. I took each one and imagined who he was and what kind of relationship they might have had.” To Hughes, the least interesting was Tom Lefroy, with whom Austen shared a teenage flirtation, a puppy love previously examined in the rather slight and unsatisfying feature film Being Jane.
Hee hee heeeeeeeee!
Reuters also has an article that covers most of the same ground, and the Times chats with Greta Scacchi about her portrayal of Cassandra Austen, though oddly they run a photo of Olivia Williams with the article, and they really don’t talk much about Miss Austen Regrets. The journalist seems more interesting in putting a “gotcha” on Ms. Scacchi and getting her to say something unguarded.
So UK Janeites, do stop in and let us know what you think of the film once you’ve seen it!














April 27th, 2008 at 4:33 am
I loved it.
April 27th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
JA also wrote;
By-the-bye, as I must leave off being young, I find many douceurs in being a sort of chaperone, for I am put on the sofa near the fire, and can drink as much wine as i like.
But personally I still think that this was JA’s manner of writing trivia in her letters - very tongue in cheek.
As for the following,
‘I believe I drank too much wine last night; I know not else how to account for the shaking of my hand today.’”
I definitely see this as typical JA style. I confess I don’t know the context in which it’s written - what went before or after. Could it be that she is joking about some ailment at the time of writing and is blaming the wine for it? Shouldn’t she be having a headache, the more prominent of symptoms of a hangover???!!!!
The shaking of hand goes more with being drunk at precisely that time.
Well, in trying to defend JA I may have established myself as a drunkard
April 28th, 2008 at 9:02 am
This movie portraits Jane Austen, a respectable authoress (excellent performance of Olivia Williams) with rising career and popularity and interested in gentlemen. I got the impression that had a proposal been made to her she might have accepted it and it might have happened unless that lethal disease had come.
I could not find the quote “I believe I drank too much wine last night; I know not else how to account for the shaking of my hand today.” in any of Austen’s letters. If somebody knows it let tell us the date of the letter.
April 28th, 2008 at 9:13 am
I liked the film, especially since the script was so intelligently written, but I had mixed emotions about the film’s overall tone, which was so somber. While I thought this film was worth watching and rewatching for Olivia’s performance alone, I can’t say I loved it.
April 28th, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Dead baby joke?
April 28th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
I didn’t love it, but it was watchable enough. I too thought OLiva WIlliams made the best of the part written; though i have to say I think Cassandra came across as rather weak.
I do much prefer this film to Becoming Jane however, much more of Jane’s personality did seem to appear onscreen, though some bits seemed a little out of synch (but that’s probably personal opinion of the authoress)and the tone was quite sombre- some more lighthearted and funny moments would have been nice, especially with the inevitable tragic end….
April 28th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Oh, she could be very flippant and cynical…
“Mrs. Hall, of Sherborne, was brought to bed yesterday of a dead child, some weeks before she expected, owing to a fright. I suppose she happened unawares to look at her husband.”
Letter to Cassandra - October 27, 1798
and…
“Only think of Mrs. Holder’s being dead! — Poor woman, she has done the only thing in the world she could possibly do to make one cease to abuse her!” (October 14, 1813)
Sweet, gentle, retiring maiden aunt indeed!
April 28th, 2008 at 5:19 pm
Boris - here is the quote and date:
“I believe I drank too much wine last night at Hurstbourne; I know not how else to account for the shaking of my hand to-day. You will kindly make allowance therefore for any indistinctness of writing, by attributing it to this venial error.”
– letter of November 20 1800
April 28th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Hmmm, I’ve never read the letters, but reading Karenlee’s (#7 above) quotes, now I see why people say Jane was a satirist — these quotes sound like “Mr. Palmer-isms” (from S&S).
April 30th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
I quite liked it - OW was really, really wonderful. Of course, I prefer to think that Jane and Cassie and Mamma Austen (and their friend) lived quite happily in their little cottage, with Jane scribbling merrily away in the corner (I’m sure her mother never yelled at her for not getting married), but that doesn’t really make a very long film, and there definitely were financial worries for them all. Even if I think it went a bit far to the bitter side, I’m so glad it got made because it shows a talented, complicated, successful, and attractive 40 year old woman living life (more or less) on her own terms. Brava!
May 1st, 2008 at 1:32 am
Thank you Karenlee for the date of the letter, it is much older to be mentioned by Mrs. Hughes. As for the Miss Austen’s cynicisms and jokes, just take them as rumbling as Mr. Plumptre did. I find her rumbling amusing and do not notice something unkindly meant behind it. All we need to understand and enjoy Austen is to have sense of humour and not to take things much seriously.
May 4th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
Well, I do think letters were destroyed when Jane was upset, or distressed. There are missing letters from when she found out she was to leave Steventon for Bath, the proposal by Harris Wither, and others. Significant events, and the letters are missing. I can’t imagine Cassandra preserving any letters that were overly critical of family members either.
Whereas I don’t agree with the reasons given in the film as why to chose to remain single and I certainly don’t believe the Tom Lefroy incident to be as insignificant as the film makes out it to be, I think overall it was very well done and captured something of the impression of her personality I got from reading her letters. OW was fantastic.