This article gave us a severe throbbing pain directly above our right eye. The author says right up front that she is not a big Jane Austen reader, but still! But still!
It begins with a lot of oh-look-at-the-obsessed-Janeites-aren’t-they-cute-with-their-board-games-and-naming-their-cat nonsense. Then we rapidly proceed to complete nonsense.
Jane Austen was one of eight children of an aristocratic mother and a handsome father whose family had lost its money.
WHAT?
The unmarried Jane lived first with one sibling then another.
NO! It’s called “paying visits for long stretches of time” and WAS PERFECTLY NORMAL! Jane wasn’t Fanny Price for crying out loud!
“She lived well without having anything in her own right,” Davis said. “All of her novels are about getting married.”
Yes, they’re not about anything else. Sigh.
The language is difficult to read with an archaic vocabulary, Davis said. “Our vocabulary today is elementary.” The 19th century conversations “used long, convoluted sentences.”
Long, yes. Convoluted, no. They make perfect sense and are elegant in their construction. If you are not accustomed to it, slow down a little, but it is perfectly comprehensible. Jane did not write in middle English.
“They’re like people we know,” she said. “Some seem gracious but are scheming for position. There can be a lack of civility, and all are from dysfunctional families.”
Well. Some, certainly, but not all.
It’s nice to know that the upcoming biographical film about Jane Austen will clear up all these misapprehensions, isn’t it? *headdesk*