Alert Janeite Karenlee sent us a link to a blog post about a talk on chick lit and literary genres at the Edinburgh Book Festival.
She began by reading some extracts from a number of clearly romance novels and asked the audience if anyone could identify which books they were from. The quality of the writing varied, the purpleness of the prose varied, but they all involved a love story of some description. It turned out she had read us extracts from a modern literary novel, modern chicklit, great European literature (Anna Karenina), great English literature (Jane Austen), ‘classic fiction’ (DK Broster), and finished with some modern Mills & Boon. In simply listening to the extracts there was really no way of telling which was which. There are good books and bad books everywhere.
Hear hear! Though we are on record as becoming twitchy when Jane Austen is referred to as “the godmother of chick lit” or “the grandmother of romance novels” or similar, we think this speaker had an excellent point. We don’t like these sort of ersatz titles because we feel that they put Jane Austen’s work into a box unnecessarily. Certainly there are elements of chick lit and/or romance novels in her work, but it’s the labeling that annoys us–and we would be equally annoyed if her work were labeled as science fiction, or fantasy, or mystery, or anything else (with perhaps the exception of “classic literature” because, let’s face it, they ARE 200 years old). The Janeite diaspora is extraordinarily diverse. That chick lit and romance authors find inspiration in her work surprises us not at all; no more than authors who write books about dragons, or about magicians, or high school students, or a hundred other subjects. The beauty of Jane Austen’s books is the universality of their themes. We would not be reading and discussing and blogging about them 200 years after they were written were that not the case.
(And while we’re here, let us put in a good, albeit off-topic, word for Naomi Novik’s wonderful Temeraire series–they are fantastic!)