Jane Austen continues to haunt the collective conscious in newspaper articles.
Alert Janeite Kay wrote to tell us that the Minneapolis Star Tribune Sunday had an article about reasons for an increase in crime that was titled “Senselessness and Sensibility” (the article is available online but does not have the same headline). We are not quite sure what to make of that! It’s interesting how the headline writer’s mind went to Jane (probably thought “senseless” and the rest followed) but why he or she thought to go through with a comparison invoking Jane Austen in a crime article is just really odd.
Alert Janeite Joanne sent us a link to an article on the Beeb about cell phones and civility that also had an Austen allusion.
The flexibility of having so many ways of contacting people is creating a slew of text messages and mobile calls only leading to further text messages and mobile calls and an eventual “I’ll text you on the day”. The golden age of asking to meet people occurred in the novels of Jane Austen.
Notes on cards in copperplate handwriting in scented envelopes delivered by discreet footmen are how it should be. Not vague indications of a meeting with no particular time discussed.
As Joanne pointed out, “Really? I got the impression from Austen that people turned up at other’s houses whenever they felt like it with no prior warning needed. When Darcy asks if he can bring Georgiana round to meet Elizabeth he doesn’t specify a date or time and came much earlier than expected.” We couldn’t have snarked it better.
USAToday has an article about Eden Collinsworth’s new book that contains the following:
Collinsworth shows her literary expertise in her book. She gives the husband, James, the surname Willoughby, the same as Jane Austen’s Sense & Sensibility fortune hunter.
How does that show “literary expertise,” pray? It shows she’s read Jane Austen. Big whoop.
A review of Academy X in the Philadelphia Inquirer quotes another Austen allusion:
It also seems unlikely that the very smartest and the very dumbest seniors would be in a class together, since the school does use tracking. And even the most moronic 18-year-olds wouldn’t, in all seriousness, say something like, “Handsome? That’s a word for a guy. Maybe Emma’s a guy.”
Oh, honey, you have no idea how very stupid people can be about Jane Austen.