“The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.”
In one of the more bizarre editorials this Cub Reporter has ever read, Hugh Mackay of the Sydney Morning Herald opines that the whole “universal literacy” thing is so 1999.
Yet in our enthusiasm for the idea that everyone should be able to read and write fluently, we may be missing a crucial point: in today’s culture, finely honed literacy skills are simply not as important as they once were. Important for those who appreciate the joys of reading, yes; important for those whose work demands literacy, yes; but no longer essential for making your way in the world.
In support of this (ahem) unique opinion, he conscripts our own Miss Austen:
Far more people have enjoyed Jane Austen’s work on television than will ever read her books. Who’s to say it is “better” to read Austen than to see her work dramatised on the screen? Better for some; infinitely more tedious and unappealing for others.
Words, unimportant though they may be, fail me.












